Advertisement

• Home
• Where to run
  Running courses Hotel running maps GPS tracks Running calendars Running challenges
• Sections
  Running articles Running Top 10 Running in cold weather Running in hot weather Running with your dog Safety for runners Running nutrition Running shoes Running news True running stories Running fiction Running software Running books Running illustrations Running history Products reviews Hiking articles
• Humor
  Funny articles The Perfect Bunion Skewed Running Running cartoons Running jokes Funny videoclips
• Community
  Running in different cultures Running communities Worldwide Runners Disaster Response Team
• Wiki
  Running Wiki Disclaimer for user-generated content
• About
  Customer service Subscribe Job opportunities Join our network
• More...

Nike goes after man for ordering one pair of counterfeit shoes

LONDON, ENGLAND — If there's one thing we've learned from either the war on drugs or the RIAA's fight against music piracy, the most effective way to fight crime is to punish the end user. That must be why Nike is using a similar strategy in the U.K. to combat counterfeit footwear.

Last year, a shipment of faux Nikes was stopped at the U.K. border, prompting the company to take legal action against all the individuals who had ordered the shoes. Under U.K. law, it is a trademark violation to import products that infringe on an existing trademark.

All but one of the people involved put up no defense. The one stalwart claimed, "I ordered training shoes over the Internet believing them to be authentic. I had no idea they were counterfeit. I have never received any goods and will not be ordering any more."

But the judge wasn't buying it:

"Whether or not the defendant believed the goods were authentic is irrelevant to the question of trade mark infringement. Whether the goods are infringing goods or counterfeit goods is an objective question. The Defendant's state of mind does not matter. Equally the Defendant's state of mind is irrelevant to the question of importation."

After the man asked for the case to be moved from the patent court to a local county court, Nike asked for a summary judgment. The judge agreed, stating that the "Defendant has no real prospect of defending the claim."

But while the judge sided with Nike, he did question the harshness of their actions:

"It may be questioned whether the sledge hammer of these proceedings is necessary in order to crack this nut of this magnitude but Nike's representative Mr. Elmslie explained, and I accept, that brand owners in this situation have no realistic alternative to enforcing their rights this way. Accordingly although this appears to be the smallest of cases, nevertheless the Claimant is entitled to bring proceedings."

In the end, the man only had to promise, which he'd actually done in his original defense, that he wouldn't do any more infringing Nike's trademark.

Credits - This true article, "Nike Goes After Man For Ordering One Pair Of Counterfeit Shoes", was published on "The Consumerist".

True running stories - A growing collection of incredible, bizarre, and unusual stories from the world of running. Prepared to be shocked at what we uncover when it comes to strange news, first-hand accounts, headlines, and reports from running around the world.